...
Tuesday, December 6, 2022

Opinion | Virginia politicians pick self-preservation over principle

399
SHARES
2.3k
VIEWS


Placeholder whereas article actions load

I’ve written lots about Goldman v. Brink, the long-running lawsuit difficult the constitutionality of Virginia’s 2021 House of Delegates elections. The lawsuit, filed again in June by my former Post writing companion Paul Goldman, poses basic questions concerning the rule of legislation and supposedly inviolable one-man one-vote principle.

But it’s vital to do not forget that for all of the authorized points and questions of principle surrounding this case, politics is at its core. And on that challenge, William Ferguson Reid Sr. — “Fergie,” he insists — believes Virginia Democrats are lacking an unlimited alternative to construct their get together and arise for voting rights.

The 97 year-old Reid, who co-founded the Richmond Crusade for Voters in 1956 and in 1968 grew to become the first Black member of the Virginia General Assembly within the twentieth century, informed me Democrats need to “seize this moment.”

Reid stated, “It’s in Democrats’ interest to run this year, but they just don’t want to see it.”

Speaking with the zeal and willpower of a lifelong grass-roots campaigner, Reid stated the congressional midterm elections imply “there will be a lot of money available for candidates, and much better voter turnout.” Reid believes House of Delegates candidates might “ride the coattails” of their congressional counterparts on Election Day and retake the bulk they misplaced following the November elections.

Asked why they haven’t seized this chance, Reid stated he believes it’s as a result of Virginia Democrats are “happy with the status quo.”

That doesn’t imply they like being within the House minority. But getting concerned within the Goldman v. Brink case and actively pushing for the courtroom to make use of the Cosner v. Dalton resolution to repair the issue of facially unconstitutional House of Delegates districts requires each a long-term plan and the desire to hold it out.

Reid says Democrats don’t have both.

“They don’t have a plan for getting out the vote if an election does happen,” Reid stated, noting that “most politicians take elections for granted and don’t want to do the gut work of getting people organized and getting them to the polls.”

Though some Democrats have quietly stated they’re ready to run once more this November if the federal courts orders particular elections, none has come ahead to endorse Goldman’s lawsuit. But people saying they’d run — if required — and the Democratic equipment being able to help particular elections in 100 House districts (assuming Democrats would contest all of them — and don’t rely on that) are totally various things.

Right now, Reid says, Democrats are extra thinking about defending their incumbents than they’re in constructing for the long run.

Incumbent safety is hardly distinctive to Democrats. It’s a part of the rationale Republican Attorney General Jason Miyares (R) picked up the struggle in opposition to Goldman proper the place his predecessor, Democrat Mark R. Herring, left off.

The GOP political calculus in opposition to particular elections is easy: Running out the clock on a Cosner-style treatment means Republicans can preserve their House majority till 2023 — assured. Running within the new, state Supreme Court-approved House districts — which slightly favor Democrats — would put that majority in danger.

Of course it’s cynical. And, sure, it shreds a long time of Republican rhetoric concerning the rule of legislation and reverence for the structure.

Reid, who spent years wrestling with the Byrd Machine and its thicket of legal guidelines and customs designed to maintain Blacks silent and preserve political energy concentrated within the fingers of a choose few, is aware of loads about Virginia’s model of political cynicism.

When I requested him why Democrats have maintained a Byrd-like silence on the Goldman case, Reid stated there have been two sorts of politicians. “One is interested in building the party, seeking a majority, and running candidates in every district at every election.”

“The other,” Reid stated, “is only interested in incumbent survival.”

On the redistricting case, Democrats and Republican are in near-complete settlement: Survival trumps principle — simply because it at all times has.

Next Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

EnglishRussianGermanPortugueseSpanish