Facebook’s IPO 10 years later — new name, same CEO and a familiar problem

A decade in the past, Facebook instructed the general public markets that it was pouring cash into smartphone apps as a result of cell utilization was key to the corporate’s development, despite the fact that it did “not at the moment immediately generate any significant income” on the time.

That was within the prospectus for its Nasdaq debut, which came about 10 years in the past Wednesday and resulted within the largest preliminary public providing ever for a U.S. tech firm. Facebook’s $100 billion-plus market cap immediately made it some of the worthwhile tech firms on the planet.

But inside three months the inventory had misplaced roughly half its worth because the market heeded Facebook’s warning. With shoppers flocking to smartphones earlier than there was a confirmed enterprise mannequin for advertisements on the small screens, traders anxious that the corporate’s days of hyper development have been within the rearview mirror.

We know the way that labored out.

Facebook is now greater than 25 instances larger by income than it was in 2012. And by 2018, over 90% of ad sales got here from cell. At its market cap peak in 2021, Facebook was worth over $1 trillion, largely on the power of its core cell app in addition to Instagram and WhatsApp, which it acquired.

The firm now has a new name, Meta. And of the six prime executives from the times of the IPO, solely two stay: co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg.

However, for traders the dilemma appears fairly just like these days. The know-how panorama is altering, and Zuckerberg is making one more bet-the-farm wager on the place it is going. Facebook stated in October it can spend about $10 billion over the following 12 months growing applied sciences to construct the metaverse, a world of digital work and play that buyers will entry via a headset.

Like in 2012, there is not any massive present enterprise mannequin and no certainty that Zuckerberg’s imaginative and prescient will play out as he predicts.

“My issues close to the metaverse are that investments are extra akin to drilling for oil wells — you would possibly come up empty-handed, you would possibly strike it wealthy,” stated Brian Yacktman, chief funding officer of YCG Investments, which oversees greater than $1 billion in property. “I simply query how giant it will likely be and who would be the winners.”

The metaverse’s foggy future is only one purpose the corporate’s inventory has dropped 47% since reaching its excessive in September, by far the worst efficiency among the many six most beneficial U.S. tech firms over that stretch. User numbers declined for the primary time ever within the fourth quarter and Apple’s privateness modifications are hurting Facebook’s means to supply focused advertisements.

There’s additionally the reputational hit the corporate has taken since whistleblower and ex-employee Frances Haugen leaked inner paperwork displaying that Facebook is conscious of the hurt its merchandise trigger, notably to youthful customers, whereas avoiding taking actions to repair them.

Yacktman nonetheless owns Meta shares, however his agency hasn’t added to its place in fairly a whereas. He says the sell-off displays the market’s view that the metaverse is a money sinkhole and little greater than a Zuckerberg plaything. Meanwhile, Facebook stays the clear No. 2 in U.S. digital promoting, a market that Insider Intelligence expects will broaden by nearly 50% to $300 billion by 2025.

“They have a cash-gushing machine proper now, and the market is ascribing zero worth to the money they’re burning for the metaverse,” Yacktman stated. In different phrases, he stated, the core advert enterprise is strong and “you might have a free choice on the metaverse.”

The firm’s IPO in 2012 was historic. Facebook raised $16 billion, the third-largest U.S. IPO ever, behind solely Visa in 2008 and General Motors in 2010. Within the tech trade, the most important as much as that time had been Agere Systems, which spun out of Lucent Technologies in 2001 and raised about $4.1 billion.

By the time Facebook went public, it was already one of many dominant manufacturers on the web, with over 500 million every day energetic customers worldwide and $1 billion in quarterly income. Its valuation had soared on the secondary market, as a host of personal fairness funds, mutual fund firms and hedge funds bid up the value by providing hefty payouts to staff and present traders.

Morgan Stanley led Facebook’s IPO, in a coup over Wall Street rival Goldman Sachs, however the providing did not go as deliberate. The firm raised the value vary headed into the providing, at the same time as inner issues have been circulating about Facebook’s outlook for the second quarter and full 12 months. A bunch of shareholders sued the social media firm and Morgan Stanley for withholding materials data.

The Nasdaq additionally suffered what it referred to as a “technical error” that delayed the opening of Facebook buying and selling and stored some orders from being correctly fulfilled. The inventory completed its first day little modified and proceeded to plunge from there, starting with a 19% drop over the following two days.

Facebook shares did not get well to their IPO stage of $38 till August 2013, greater than 14 months after their debut.

Kevin Landis, the chief funding officer of Firsthand Capital Management, watched the drama play out from his workplace in San Jose, California, about 20 miles from Facebook’s headquarters in Menlo Park.

Firsthand began shopping for the corporate’s shares within the personal market in 2011, a buy that he stated “regarded sensible for about 5 minutes” till the inventory cratered after the IPO. He held that funding till about 2014, when the inventory had recovered and was buying and selling within the 70s.

Landis stated that, in one other of his funds, he began shopping for after the drop, when the inventory was within the 20s, and he rode that up till it hit about $200 across the time the pandemic began in 2020.

“The evaluation was easy: Facebook was going to be a highly effective advert platform,” Landis stated, referring to his preliminary thesis. The solely comparable mannequin was Google, and Facebook “might be value a substantial fraction of what Google was value,” he added.

Still, Landis stated he by no means bought a Facebook web page of his personal as a result of he loathed the lack of privateness that comes with handing over a lot private information.

“I broke one in every of my very own guidelines — investing in one thing I assumed was massive, however with out moving into it as much as my elbows,” he stated.

It was a profitable guess. By the end of 2013, cell promoting accounted for 45% of Facebook’s advert income, up from 11% in 2012, proving once more that manufacturers observe eyeballs. Between 2013 and 2018, Facebook’s income development averaged about 50% a 12 months.

The engine was so sturdy that even seemingly catastrophic information did not hassle Facebook’s financials. Following the 2016 election of Donald Trump as president, Zuckerberg repeatedly played down the position his web site had in permitting for the unfold of disinformation and election interference by Russians. Then got here the 2018 Cambridge Analytica scandal, as experiences revealed the analytics agency improperly accessed the information of 87 million Facebook customers and used it to assist Trump goal advertisements for the 2016 election.

Finally, the Haugen saga late final 12 months began with a series of reports in The Wall Street Journal and was adopted by tales from many different publications, detailing Facebook’s concentrate on development regardless of the detrimental penalties of its merchandise.

Facebook’s habits has led to quite a few authorities investigations. Executives have routinely been referred to as to testify earlier than Congress, and in September a number of U.S. lawmakers accused the corporate of following the Big Tobacco playbook, “pushing a product that they know is dangerous to the well being of younger individuals,” within the phrases of Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass.

The Haugen papers coincided with the tip of the prolonged bull market rally for Facebook. But the tech sector broadly was additionally nearing its peak, and began retreating in November as issues about inflation and rising rates of interest punished high-growth shares.

For Meta shareholders, the worst day on file got here in February. The stock plummeted 26% following a weak income forecast and a $10 billion anticipated hit from privateness modifications that Apple made to its cell working system to restrict advert concentrating on.

Far from the speedy growth days of a few years in the past, Facebook now faces a potential revenue contraction within the second quarter amid inflationary pressures and the struggle in Ukraine in addition to the surging reputation of video app TikTok, which is snagging customers and advert {dollars}.

“There’s nothing existential, they are not going bankrupt and they are not going to expire of cash — it is simply not a very compelling story for the close to future,” stated David Golden, a accomplice at tech funding agency Revolution Ventures in San Francisco. Facebook’s “viselike grip in the marketplace has been considerably loosened with alternate options in social media and alternate options in different channels,” he stated.

Zuckerberg, who simply turned 38 and maintains management over his firm and its board, is not speaking a lot about social media and cell advertisements in any respect today. Instead, he is all concerning the metaverse and Meta’s Reality Labs division, which racked up a lack of nearly $3 billion within the first quarter on income of $695 million, principally from VR headsets.

“It’s not going to be till these merchandise actually hit the market and scale in a significant method and this market finally ends up being massive that this will probably be a massive income or revenue contributor to the enterprise,” Zuckerberg stated on the corporate’s earnings name final month. “This is laying the groundwork for what I anticipate to be a very thrilling 2030s when that is like — when that is kind of extra established as the first computing platform.”

Landis, who hasn’t owned the inventory in two years, says he is extra frightened than enthusiastic about Zuckerberg’s imaginative and prescient and sees an absorption in digital actuality as “extremely dystopian.”

“My hope is that it does not take over individuals’s lives, it simply enhances individuals’s lives,” Landis stated.

Given how a lot Facebook is aware of about its customers and what the general public has discovered in current years about how the corporate handles information and privateness, Landis does not belief it to do the precise factor.

“It’s inconceivable to take a look at that firm and not have tremendously combined feelings about it,” he stated.

WATCH: Meta is ‘one of the best assets in consumer tech’ says Evercore ISI’s Mahaney